The Japan Times - Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant

EUR -
AED 4.006889
AFN 76.941747
ALL 99.18358
AMD 426.163044
ANG 1.964079
AOA 998.259563
ARS 1164.778231
AUD 1.712143
AWG 1.966517
AZN 1.871299
BAM 1.955163
BBD 2.200392
BDT 132.416838
BGN 1.955384
BHD 0.411096
BIF 3229.414159
BMD 1.090994
BND 1.451167
BOB 7.53058
BRL 6.202738
BSD 1.0898
BTN 94.62759
BWP 14.817559
BYN 3.566458
BYR 21383.489982
BZD 2.189096
CAD 1.560809
CDF 3136.609039
CHF 0.961439
CLF 0.02617
CLP 1004.246603
CNY 7.89138
CNH 7.89551
COP 4443.892886
CRC 543.60039
CUC 1.090994
CUP 28.911351
CVE 110.229575
CZK 25.064498
DJF 194.068738
DKK 7.460471
DOP 68.584816
DZD 145.664132
EGP 55.104927
ERN 16.364916
ETB 142.927417
FJD 2.516812
FKP 0.843128
GBP 0.840917
GEL 3.038391
GGP 0.843128
GHS 16.847821
GIP 0.843128
GMD 77.996549
GNF 9471.491632
GTQ 8.405385
GYD 228.000234
HKD 8.47724
HNL 27.966287
HRK 7.534625
HTG 145.192767
HUF 400.130704
IDR 17854.290381
ILS 3.976953
IMP 0.843128
INR 94.861147
IQD 1429.608347
IRR 45824.618331
ISK 146.186361
JEP 0.843128
JMD 170.752859
JOD 0.773563
JPY 163.288835
KES 141.505178
KGS 95.407469
KHR 4364.842526
KMF 493.311542
KPW 981.894948
KRW 1583.620187
KWD 0.336115
KYD 0.894621
KZT 547.542517
LAK 23645.990654
LBP 98593.638506
LKR 322.207884
LRD 217.289199
LSL 19.82076
LTL 3.221423
LVL 0.659931
LYD 5.250738
MAD 10.568749
MDL 19.386989
MGA 5100.105846
MKD 61.499365
MMK 2291.070813
MNT 3788.458267
MOP 8.734636
MRU 43.55918
MUR 49.049632
MVR 16.866773
MWK 1891.051668
MXN 21.796864
MYR 4.850672
MZN 69.43024
NAD 19.82076
NGN 1688.557054
NIO 39.957024
NOK 11.514027
NPR 151.848981
NZD 1.876173
OMR 0.420026
PAB 1.090994
PEN 3.991194
PGK 4.431305
PHP 62.470845
PKR 305.577042
PLN 4.177227
PYG 8717.412633
QAR 3.971051
RON 4.988726
RSD 117.526502
RUB 93.279738
RWF 1532.604306
SAR 4.091486
SBD 9.273222
SCR 16.280047
SDG 653.464851
SEK 11.030144
SGD 1.455055
SHP 0.85735
SLE 24.902004
SLL 22877.607976
SOS 623.819389
SRD 39.624888
STD 22581.381099
SVC 9.545924
SYP 14185.0443
SZL 19.82076
THB 36.590041
TJS 11.932636
TMT 3.818675
TND 3.358057
TOP 2.622552
TRY 39.989445
TTD 7.428386
TWD 35.972657
TZS 2869.263587
UAH 45.410799
UGX 3999.119443
USD 1.090994
UYU 46.463649
UZS 14115.452782
VES 72.306197
VND 27825.81075
VUV 134.145869
WST 3.074963
XAF 657.748722
XAG 0.032225
XAU 0.000362
XCD 2.945685
XDR 0.818764
XOF 657.748722
XPF 119.331742
YER 271.095014
ZAR 19.759657
ZMK 9820.261527
ZMW 31.347793
ZWL 351.299747
  • RBGPF

    66.7800

    66.78

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0100

    10.44

    -0.1%

  • RELX

    0.6700

    49.6

    +1.35%

  • GSK

    0.7600

    40.25

    +1.89%

  • VOD

    0.3100

    9.86

    +3.14%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    11.01

    +0.18%

  • NGG

    0.9300

    64.14

    +1.45%

  • RIO

    0.4300

    63.47

    +0.68%

  • CMSC

    0.1100

    23.33

    +0.47%

  • BTI

    0.4800

    41.84

    +1.15%

  • JRI

    0.1700

    13

    +1.31%

  • BCC

    0.6500

    100

    +0.65%

  • CMSD

    0.1900

    23.54

    +0.81%

  • BP

    0.3700

    33.76

    +1.1%

  • AZN

    -0.2300

    77.37

    -0.3%

  • BCE

    0.2300

    23.7

    +0.97%

Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant
Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant / Photo: Luka GONZALES - AFP

Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant

A Peruvian farmer faces off in a German court Monday in a "David and Goliath" battle against an energy giant, demanding the firm pay for climate change damage.

Text size:

Saul Luciano Lliuya, 44, argues that electricity producer RWE -- one of the world's top emitters of climate-altering carbon dioxide -- must share the cost of protecting his hometown Huaraz from a swollen glacier lake at risk of overflowing from melting snow and ice.

He wants the German company to pay 17,000 euros ($18,400) towards flood defences for his community, arguing that the fossil fuels the firm uses to generate electricity make it partly responsible for the flood risk.

"What I am asking is for the company to take responsibility for part of the construction costs," he said at a press conference in Lima earlier this month.

"I have full confidence in these processes."

However much confidence Lliuya has in proceedings, they have moved at a glacial pace.

He first filed a lawsuit in 2015 but a court in the western German city of Essen, where RWE is headquartered, dismissed it the following year.

However, in 2017 a higher court in the city of Hamm, also in western Germany, allowed an appeal.

After a delay due to the Covid pandemic, hearings are scheduled from Monday to Wednesday, and Lliuya will be attending.

"I would never have thought that it would all take so long," Lliuya told Germanwatch, a German environmental NGO supporting him in the case.

- 'Fair contribution' -

The hearing will ask if Lliuya's property in Peru's Ancash region is at substantial risk of flooding, examining evidence collected by court-appointed experts who travelled to the area in 2022.

If confirmed, a subsequent hearing would look at the question of RWE's responsibility.

Lliuya bases his claim on a 2014 study that concluded RWE was responsible for 0.47 percent of all global carbon emissions since the start of the industrial era.

RWE, which has never operated in Peru, should pay that share of the 3.5 million euros it would cost to lower the waters of Lake Palcacocha, he says.

Founded in 1898, RWE power plants today use a variety of power sources including solar, wind, gas and coal.

"It is time for companies like RWE to make a fair contribution to the costs of the damage they have helped to cause," said Francesca Mascha Klein, legal officer at Germanwatch.

RWE says a court ruling in favour of Lliuya would set a precedent of holding people responsible under German law for actions that have environmental consequences far outside the country.

"We think that is legally inadmissible and the wrong way to address this issue socially and politically," a spokesman said.

Dismissing the case in 2015, the Essen court said that it was impossible to draw a link between particular emissions and particular damage.

The Hamm hearing might be the first stage towards overturning that opinion at a time when 43 climate-damage cases are ongoing worldwide, according to Zero Carbon Analytics, a not-for-profit research group.

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, the law firm representing RWE, says that there could be major implications: "The sum in dispute may be less than 20,000 euros. But the precedent-setting potential is clear."

S.Yamamoto--JT