The Japan Times - Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant

EUR -
AED 4.009997
AFN 76.964387
ALL 99.220998
AMD 428.372779
ANG 1.968379
AOA 999.034005
ARS 1165.584001
AUD 1.711055
AWG 1.968042
AZN 1.857199
BAM 1.959344
BBD 2.205209
BDT 132.698836
BGN 1.955382
BHD 0.411398
BIF 3183.259907
BMD 1.09184
BND 1.454331
BOB 7.546652
BRL 6.209405
BSD 1.092186
BTN 94.829981
BWP 14.849931
BYN 3.574282
BYR 21400.066602
BZD 2.193879
CAD 1.560944
CDF 3139.040114
CHF 0.9622
CLF 0.02619
CLP 1005.044161
CNY 7.897495
CNH 7.892328
COP 4447.337821
CRC 544.780515
CUC 1.09184
CUP 28.933764
CVE 110.711967
CZK 25.046707
DJF 194.041291
DKK 7.460336
DOP 68.69472
DZD 145.329376
EGP 55.147741
ERN 16.377602
ETB 140.847322
FJD 2.518767
FKP 0.843782
GBP 0.840788
GEL 3.040797
GGP 0.843782
GHS 16.925835
GIP 0.843782
GMD 78.612163
GNF 9449.876318
GTQ 8.421311
GYD 228.50441
HKD 8.483216
HNL 28.125499
HRK 7.53413
HTG 143.240433
HUF 397.96491
IDR 17891.711296
ILS 3.987351
IMP 0.843782
INR 94.900397
IQD 1430.310574
IRR 45980.121683
ISK 146.098879
JEP 0.843782
JMD 171.049427
JOD 0.774225
JPY 163.173323
KES 141.396287
KGS 95.422243
KHR 4381.020106
KMF 492.256278
KPW 982.656119
KRW 1575.087516
KWD 0.336254
KYD 0.910151
KZT 544.560119
LAK 23649.257315
LBP 97828.875995
LKR 323.698534
LRD 217.367456
LSL 19.893461
LTL 3.22392
LVL 0.660443
LYD 5.259942
MAD 10.533526
MDL 19.632605
MGA 5104.352752
MKD 61.534726
MMK 2292.846866
MNT 3791.395104
MOP 8.741273
MRU 43.560216
MUR 49.187302
MVR 16.819017
MWK 1896.526117
MXN 21.787332
MYR 4.851592
MZN 69.779736
NAD 19.892911
NGN 1681.335433
NIO 40.13059
NOK 11.513356
NPR 151.72817
NZD 1.875124
OMR 0.420328
PAB 1.092176
PEN 3.9972
PGK 4.394113
PHP 62.567941
PKR 305.906312
PLN 4.186971
PYG 8679.701532
QAR 3.975419
RON 4.97737
RSD 117.16861
RUB 91.114111
RWF 1534.035387
SAR 4.09505
SBD 9.183779
SCR 15.66793
SDG 656.196144
SEK 11.018469
SGD 1.452251
SHP 0.858015
SLE 24.921287
SLL 22895.342846
SOS 623.992949
SRD 39.405596
STD 22598.886332
SVC 9.556287
SYP 14196.040638
SZL 19.893297
THB 36.674725
TJS 11.937266
TMT 3.82144
TND 3.35817
TOP 2.557202
TRY 40.015662
TTD 7.413343
TWD 35.997922
TZS 2891.06934
UAH 45.278709
UGX 4006.247279
USD 1.09184
UYU 46.544198
UZS 14139.329861
VES 71.564437
VND 27874.67859
VUV 134.249859
WST 3.077347
XAF 657.145773
XAG 0.032291
XAU 0.000364
XCD 2.950752
XDR 0.818277
XOF 657.834557
XPF 119.331742
YER 268.86575
ZAR 19.760603
ZMK 9827.870159
ZMW 31.327672
ZWL 351.572077
  • RBGPF

    -0.4100

    66.02

    -0.62%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    10.45

    +0.96%

  • CMSC

    0.1100

    23.33

    +0.47%

  • RELX

    0.6700

    49.6

    +1.35%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    11.01

    +0.18%

  • VOD

    0.3100

    9.86

    +3.14%

  • GSK

    0.7600

    40.25

    +1.89%

  • RIO

    0.4300

    63.47

    +0.68%

  • AZN

    -0.2300

    77.37

    -0.3%

  • BCC

    0.6500

    100

    +0.65%

  • NGG

    0.9300

    64.14

    +1.45%

  • JRI

    0.1700

    13

    +1.31%

  • BCE

    0.2300

    23.7

    +0.97%

  • CMSD

    0.1900

    23.54

    +0.81%

  • BTI

    0.4800

    41.84

    +1.15%

  • BP

    0.3700

    33.76

    +1.1%

Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant
Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant / Photo: Luka GONZALES - AFP

Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant

A Peruvian farmer faces off in a German court Monday in a "David and Goliath" battle against an energy giant, demanding the firm pay for climate change damage.

Text size:

Saul Luciano Lliuya, 44, argues that electricity producer RWE -- one of the world's top emitters of climate-altering carbon dioxide -- must share the cost of protecting his hometown Huaraz from a swollen glacier lake at risk of overflowing from melting snow and ice.

He wants the German company to pay 17,000 euros ($18,400) towards flood defences for his community, arguing that the fossil fuels the firm uses to generate electricity make it partly responsible for the flood risk.

"What I am asking is for the company to take responsibility for part of the construction costs," he said at a press conference in Lima earlier this month.

"I have full confidence in these processes."

However much confidence Lliuya has in proceedings, they have moved at a glacial pace.

He first filed a lawsuit in 2015 but a court in the western German city of Essen, where RWE is headquartered, dismissed it the following year.

However, in 2017 a higher court in the city of Hamm, also in western Germany, allowed an appeal.

After a delay due to the Covid pandemic, hearings are scheduled from Monday to Wednesday, and Lliuya will be attending.

"I would never have thought that it would all take so long," Lliuya told Germanwatch, a German environmental NGO supporting him in the case.

- 'Fair contribution' -

The hearing will ask if Lliuya's property in Peru's Ancash region is at substantial risk of flooding, examining evidence collected by court-appointed experts who travelled to the area in 2022.

If confirmed, a subsequent hearing would look at the question of RWE's responsibility.

Lliuya bases his claim on a 2014 study that concluded RWE was responsible for 0.47 percent of all global carbon emissions since the start of the industrial era.

RWE, which has never operated in Peru, should pay that share of the 3.5 million euros it would cost to lower the waters of Lake Palcacocha, he says.

Founded in 1898, RWE power plants today use a variety of power sources including solar, wind, gas and coal.

"It is time for companies like RWE to make a fair contribution to the costs of the damage they have helped to cause," said Francesca Mascha Klein, legal officer at Germanwatch.

RWE says a court ruling in favour of Lliuya would set a precedent of holding people responsible under German law for actions that have environmental consequences far outside the country.

"We think that is legally inadmissible and the wrong way to address this issue socially and politically," a spokesman said.

Dismissing the case in 2015, the Essen court said that it was impossible to draw a link between particular emissions and particular damage.

The Hamm hearing might be the first stage towards overturning that opinion at a time when 43 climate-damage cases are ongoing worldwide, according to Zero Carbon Analytics, a not-for-profit research group.

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, the law firm representing RWE, says that there could be major implications: "The sum in dispute may be less than 20,000 euros. But the precedent-setting potential is clear."

S.Yamamoto--JT