The Japan Times - No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

EUR -
AED 3.780953
AFN 77.233348
ALL 98.956186
AMD 404.916572
ANG 1.842769
AOA 941.392826
ARS 1084.344915
AUD 1.664155
AWG 1.854226
AZN 1.750147
BAM 1.950581
BBD 2.064476
BDT 124.696352
BGN 1.956118
BHD 0.388038
BIF 3026.601773
BMD 1.029411
BND 1.39766
BOB 7.081053
BRL 5.978921
BSD 1.022474
BTN 89.08763
BWP 14.368971
BYN 3.346247
BYR 20176.448222
BZD 2.053904
CAD 1.491132
CDF 2933.820805
CHF 0.939523
CLF 0.036772
CLP 1014.638127
CNY 7.403417
CNH 7.535909
COP 4284.839368
CRC 520.90622
CUC 1.029411
CUP 27.279382
CVE 109.970753
CZK 25.213326
DJF 182.082804
DKK 7.460478
DOP 63.539987
DZD 139.752254
EGP 51.831958
ERN 15.441159
ETB 130.795005
FJD 2.398084
FKP 0.847809
GBP 0.830304
GEL 2.923556
GGP 0.847809
GHS 15.618211
GIP 0.847809
GMD 74.633315
GNF 8837.354043
GTQ 7.91183
GYD 213.917624
HKD 8.019598
HNL 26.047558
HRK 7.596585
HTG 133.742148
HUF 408.389875
IDR 16855.260727
ILS 3.686412
IMP 0.847809
INR 89.684827
IQD 1339.416147
IRR 43338.187312
ISK 146.176321
JEP 0.847809
JMD 161.15879
JOD 0.730265
JPY 159.848429
KES 132.886464
KGS 90.021832
KHR 4111.997598
KMF 492.933548
KPW 926.469676
KRW 1506.37799
KWD 0.317748
KYD 0.85212
KZT 534.380168
LAK 22240.491497
LBP 91563.904025
LKR 306.300437
LRD 203.472607
LSL 19.335764
LTL 3.039582
LVL 0.62268
LYD 5.020567
MAD 10.321483
MDL 19.156743
MGA 4881.937483
MKD 61.614644
MMK 3343.48555
MNT 3497.937409
MOP 8.208337
MRU 40.848702
MUR 48.39281
MVR 15.852997
MWK 1773.055865
MXN 21.02949
MYR 4.59066
MZN 65.771987
NAD 19.335764
NGN 1526.451186
NIO 37.629316
NOK 11.751371
NPR 142.540607
NZD 1.841044
OMR 0.396315
PAB 1.022464
PEN 3.811202
PGK 4.103022
PHP 60.067136
PKR 285.27726
PLN 4.234494
PYG 8062.4275
QAR 3.728424
RON 4.97525
RSD 117.104708
RUB 102.684705
RWF 1445.332748
SAR 3.861178
SBD 8.724445
SCR 14.754421
SDG 618.675875
SEK 11.459569
SGD 1.401337
SHP 0.847809
SLE 23.577218
SLL 21586.225989
SOS 584.336501
SRD 36.1374
STD 21306.721536
SVC 8.947191
SYP 13384.396913
SZL 19.329468
THB 34.911944
TJS 11.145017
TMT 3.602937
TND 3.300668
TOP 2.410982
TRY 37.072829
TTD 6.932451
TWD 33.961798
TZS 2612.92103
UAH 42.763778
UGX 3760.936925
USD 1.029411
UYU 44.320766
UZS 13277.47369
VES 60.186713
VND 25972.030033
VUV 122.213696
WST 2.883201
XAF 654.206551
XAG 0.032711
XAU 0.000366
XCD 2.782033
XDR 0.784202
XOF 654.206551
XPF 119.331742
YER 256.118451
ZAR 19.343058
ZMK 9265.936786
ZMW 28.706191
ZWL 331.469801
  • RBGPF

    0.2700

    66.27

    +0.41%

  • BCC

    -1.0200

    125.14

    -0.82%

  • SCS

    -0.4100

    11.07

    -3.7%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1400

    7.35

    -1.9%

  • NGG

    0.6100

    62.01

    +0.98%

  • RIO

    -0.5600

    59.85

    -0.94%

  • BCE

    0.2400

    24.03

    +1%

  • GSK

    -0.3700

    34.9

    -1.06%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    49.85

    -0.08%

  • JRI

    -0.0700

    12.46

    -0.56%

  • AZN

    -0.9000

    69.86

    -1.29%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    23.75

    -0.38%

  • BTI

    0.1000

    39.74

    +0.25%

  • BP

    -0.1900

    30.87

    -0.62%

  • CMSC

    -0.1200

    23.35

    -0.51%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    8.49

    -0.59%

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air
No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

To save the world from the worst ravages of climate change, slashing carbon pollution is no longer enough -- CO2 will also need to be sucked out of the atmosphere and buried, a landmark UN report is expected to say on Monday.

Text size:

If humanity had started to curb greenhouse gas emissions 20 years ago, an annual decrease of two percent out to 2030 would have put us on the right path. Challenging, but doable.

Instead, the emissions climbed another 20 percent to more than 40 billion tonnes of CO2 in 2021.

This means an abrupt drop in emissions of six or seven percent a year is needed to avoid breaching the Paris climate treaty's goal of capping global warming at "well below" two degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels.

Staying under the safer aspirational threshold of 1.5C would mean an even steeper decline.

To put that in perspective, the painful 2020 shutdown of the global economy due to Covid saw "only" a 5.6 percent decrease in CO2 emissions.

Hence the need for carbon dioxide removal (CDR), or "negative emissions", likely to figure prominently in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

Even under the most aggressive carbon-cutting scenarios, several billion tonnes of CO2 will need to be extracted each year from the atmosphere by 2050, and an accumulated total of hundreds of billions of tonnes by 2100.

As of today, however, CO2 removal is nowhere near these levels. The largest direct air capture facility in the world removes in a year what humanity emits in three or four seconds.

There are at least a dozen CDR techniques on the table, with different potentials and costs.

- Using bioenergy -

Most of the hundreds of models laying out a game plan for a liveable future reserve an important role for a negative emissions solution called BECCS, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

In a nutshell, this is the recipe: grow trees, burn them for energy, and bury the CO2 underground, in an abandoned mineshaft, for example.

But what works on paper (or in so-called integrated assessment models), has not materialised in reality.

One of the few commercial-scale BECCS facilities in the world, in Britain, was dropped last year from the S&P Clean Energy Index because it failed to meet sustainability criteria.

"I don't see a BECCS boom," said Oliver Geden, a senior fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and an expert on CDR.

- Planting trees -

Restoring forests and planting trees that absorb and stock CO2 as they grow also figure prominently in development scenarios achieving net-zero emissions, whether in 2050 or later.

Many businesses, including fossil fuel companies, rely heavily on carbon offset schemes based on afforestation to compensate for continuing carbon pollution.

But the amount of land needed to put a serious dent in CO2 levels through tree planting -- up to twice the size of India -- could clash with other priorities, such as growing food and biofuel crops.

Biodiversity could suffer as well, especially in savannahs converted to monoculture tree farms.

Newly planted forests could also fall victim to wildfires made more frequent and intense by rising temperatures, resulting in the release of all their stored CO2.

- 'DACCS' -

One of the youngest CDR technologies is also one of the hottest: direct air carbon capture and storage.

With variations, DACCS is a chemical process that extracts carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, converting it into solid form or locking it away underground.

Because CO2 in the air is so sparse -- a few hundred parts per million -- it is a very energy-intensive and expensive process.

DACCS has benefited from a wave of corporate backing.

Last year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk launched the $100-million X-Prize for an innovative CO2 removal technology, and Breakthrough Energy founder Bill Gates unveiled a corporate partnership to turbocharge its development.

How quickly it can scale up, and at what cost, remain open questions.

- Enhanced weathering -

Enhanced weathering involves mining and crushing rocks rich in minerals that naturally absorb CO2, and then spreading them over land or sea.

It aims to vastly accelerate a process that normally unfolds on geological timescales of tens of thousands of years.

Silicate rocks with minerals rich in calcium and magnesium but lacking metal ions such as nickel and chromium are the best raw material for the job.

But, again, it's unclear if enhanced weathering can be scaled up enough, and at what cost.

- Ocean-based methods -

Oceans already take up more than 30 percent of humanity's carbon emissions, and scientists are experimenting with ways to boost that capacity.

One approach is to enhance marine alkalinity, either by directly adding natural or synthetic alkaline minerals, or the electrochemical processing of seawater.

Another approach, known as ocean fertilisation, increases the density of tiny phytoplankton that produce and sequester organic carbon through photosynthesis, like plants on land. Adding nitrogen or iron stimulate phytoplankton growth.

The main concerns here include unintended consequences on ecosystems.

M.Sugiyama--JT