The Japan Times - Is planting trees to combat climate change 'complete nonsense'?

EUR -
AED 3.813529
AFN 77.13943
ALL 99.16878
AMD 412.763559
ANG 1.862067
AOA 949.48606
ARS 1093.926135
AUD 1.66049
AWG 1.868858
AZN 1.769716
BAM 1.957524
BBD 2.086068
BDT 125.990972
BGN 1.957293
BHD 0.391381
BIF 3058.137766
BMD 1.038254
BND 1.401755
BOB 7.139288
BRL 5.979822
BSD 1.033125
BTN 90.026294
BWP 14.429918
BYN 3.38116
BYR 20349.787937
BZD 2.075358
CAD 1.487476
CDF 2959.025536
CHF 0.939542
CLF 0.026304
CLP 1009.389318
CNY 7.563058
CNH 7.570464
COP 4325.108627
CRC 522.873133
CUC 1.038254
CUP 27.513744
CVE 110.362206
CZK 25.155904
DJF 183.98471
DKK 7.459537
DOP 63.847774
DZD 140.825505
EGP 52.198041
ERN 15.573817
ETB 132.202326
FJD 2.404574
FKP 0.855093
GBP 0.832101
GEL 2.94886
GGP 0.855093
GHS 15.910013
GIP 0.855093
GMD 74.754236
GNF 8929.994485
GTQ 7.986034
GYD 216.150384
HKD 8.086778
HNL 26.319816
HRK 7.661849
HTG 135.140984
HUF 407.262074
IDR 16933.930676
ILS 3.694706
IMP 0.855093
INR 90.475832
IQD 1353.392057
IRR 43710.513855
ISK 146.819458
JEP 0.855093
JMD 162.735687
JOD 0.736541
JPY 159.318078
KES 133.5402
KGS 90.79481
KHR 4154.719469
KMF 497.168135
KPW 934.429153
KRW 1505.494912
KWD 0.320303
KYD 0.860954
KZT 536.850268
LAK 22474.119723
LBP 92520.619241
LKR 309.487065
LRD 205.601092
LSL 19.390559
LTL 3.065695
LVL 0.62803
LYD 5.094561
MAD 10.412471
MDL 19.408375
MGA 4850.342219
MKD 61.522599
MMK 3372.210072
MNT 3527.988857
MOP 8.286999
MRU 41.243923
MUR 48.798146
MVR 15.990571
MWK 1791.503825
MXN 21.272765
MYR 4.59999
MZN 66.343232
NAD 19.390185
NGN 1545.25478
NIO 38.023674
NOK 11.672836
NPR 144.045342
NZD 1.835653
OMR 0.399731
PAB 1.03311
PEN 3.828772
PGK 4.206786
PHP 60.336605
PKR 288.200709
PLN 4.209601
PYG 8135.283028
QAR 3.766618
RON 4.977187
RSD 117.113016
RUB 104.553311
RWF 1459.306429
SAR 3.894123
SBD 8.799399
SCR 14.87442
SDG 623.990706
SEK 11.386932
SGD 1.403512
SHP 0.855093
SLE 23.78153
SLL 21771.677373
SOS 590.428575
SRD 36.447929
STD 21489.771644
SVC 9.039962
SYP 13499.384819
SZL 19.384354
THB 34.968586
TJS 11.261319
TMT 3.633891
TND 3.316521
TOP 2.431699
TRY 37.342069
TTD 7.007273
TWD 34.135709
TZS 2624.249332
UAH 43.120203
UGX 3802.34908
USD 1.038254
UYU 44.569256
UZS 13415.816548
VES 60.966309
VND 26112.100337
VUV 123.263657
WST 2.907971
XAF 656.544765
XAG 0.032268
XAU 0.000364
XCD 2.805935
XDR 0.792409
XOF 656.544765
XPF 119.331742
YER 258.318166
ZAR 19.403928
ZMK 9345.532509
ZMW 29.058014
ZWL 334.317521
  • BCC

    0.4300

    125.57

    +0.34%

  • SCS

    0.2400

    11.31

    +2.12%

  • NGG

    -0.1500

    61.86

    -0.24%

  • BCE

    0.3700

    24.4

    +1.52%

  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    23.34

    -0.04%

  • AZN

    -0.9000

    68.96

    -1.31%

  • RBGPF

    0.2700

    66.27

    +0.41%

  • GSK

    -0.0600

    34.84

    -0.17%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    23.68

    -0.3%

  • BTI

    0.4900

    40.23

    +1.22%

  • RIO

    1.3500

    61.2

    +2.21%

  • JRI

    0.1800

    12.64

    +1.42%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    7.4

    +0.68%

  • RELX

    0.0100

    49.86

    +0.02%

  • BP

    0.7700

    31.64

    +2.43%

  • VOD

    -0.2900

    8.2

    -3.54%

Is planting trees to combat climate change 'complete nonsense'?
Is planting trees to combat climate change 'complete nonsense'? / Photo: Zinyange Auntony - AFP/File

Is planting trees to combat climate change 'complete nonsense'?

Bill Gates is emphatic: "I don't plant trees," he declared recently, wading into a debate about whether mass tree planting is really much use in fighting climate change.

Text size:

The billionaire philanthropist was being probed on how he offsets his carbon emissions and insisted he avoids "some of the less proven approaches."

The claim that planting enough trees could solve the climate crisis is "complete nonsense", he told a climate discussion organised by the New York Times last week.

"Are we the science people or are we the idiots?"

Gates' polemical pronouncements made headlines and prompted criticism from backers of reforestation (planting trees in damaged forests) and afforestation (planting in areas that were not recently forest).

"I have dedicated the last 16 years of my life to making forests part of the climate solution," wrote Jad Daley, head of the American Forests NGO.

"This kind of commentary can really set us back," he said on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Mass tree planting schemes have been gaining ground for years as a way to suck carbon from the atmosphere at scale.

Even notoriously climate change-sceptical US Republicans have introduced legislation to support planting a trillion trees worldwide.

But Gates is far from alone in doubting the benefits of such ambitious plans.

A group of scientists warned on Tuesday that mass tree planting risks doing more harm than good, particularly in tropical regions.

That's primarily because it can replace complex ecosystems with monoculture plantations.

"Society has reduced the value of these ecosystems to just one metric -- carbon," the scientists from universities in Britain and South Africa wrote.

Carbon capture is "a small component of the pivotal ecological functions that tropical forests and grassy ecosystems perform," they said in an article in the Trends in Ecology and Evolution journal.

Jesus Aguirre Gutierrez, an author of the paper, pointed to examples in southern Mexico and Ghana, where once diverse forests "have now transformed into homogenous masses".

This makes them "highly vulnerable to diseases and negatively impacts local biodiversity," the senior researcher at the University of Oxford's Environmental Change Institute told AFP.

- 'Not just running around planting' -

Major tree planting commitments often involve agroforestry or plantations, where the trees will eventually be felled, releasing carbon.

And they are dominated by five tree species chosen largely for their timber and pulp value, or growth speed.

Among them is teak, which can overtake native species, "posing additional risks to native vegetation and the ecosystem", said Aguirre Gutierrez, who is also a Natural Environment Research Council fellow.

Other critiques include the lack of space globally for the many proposed mass planting projects and the risk of competition between smallholder agriculture and planting.

Misclassification of grassland and wetland as suitable for forest and planting poorly adapted or cared-for seedlings have also been problems highlighted by scientists.

So does planting trees really have no value?

Not so fast, says Daley, whose American Forests organisation says it has planted 65 million trees.

It's Gates' premise that is wrong, Daley said.

"Literally no one is saying... that forests alone can save our environment," he told AFP.

He argues that critics ignore carefully calibrated projects involving native species in areas that need reforestation and focus instead on a few poorly conceived schemes.

"This broad brush critique has ignored the fact that much reforestation is driven by the loss of forests that won't regenerate without help."

"We are not just running around planting trees wherever we feel like it to capture carbon."

There are efforts to bridge the gap between critics and proponents, including 10 "golden rules for restoring forests", proposed by Britain's Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and Botanic Gardens Conservation International.

They advise avoiding grasslands or wetlands, prioritising natural regeneration, and selecting resilient and biodiverse trees.

But they start with a rule that perhaps everyone can agree upon: protect existing forests first.

"It can take over 100 years for these forests to recover, so it is crucial that we protect what we already have before planting more."

S.Fujimoto--JT