The Japan Times - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 3.820598
AFN 77.661495
ALL 98.909854
AMD 412.515034
ANG 1.875336
AOA 950.210229
ARS 1096.228133
AUD 1.654388
AWG 1.874928
AZN 1.777928
BAM 1.954047
BBD 2.100936
BDT 126.427813
BGN 1.956026
BHD 0.391978
BIF 3042.532299
BMD 1.040182
BND 1.403654
BOB 7.19055
BRL 6.038566
BSD 1.040587
BTN 90.980081
BWP 14.441838
BYN 3.405278
BYR 20387.566856
BZD 2.090125
CAD 1.488838
CDF 2969.719622
CHF 0.937532
CLF 0.026312
CLP 1009.725368
CNY 7.563267
CNH 7.574064
COP 4344.392862
CRC 528.026373
CUC 1.040182
CUP 27.564823
CVE 110.519331
CZK 25.175942
DJF 184.860869
DKK 7.459967
DOP 64.543755
DZD 140.606567
EGP 52.340186
ERN 15.60273
ETB 132.959638
FJD 2.401266
FKP 0.85668
GBP 0.83177
GEL 2.906167
GGP 0.85668
GHS 16.028985
GIP 0.85668
GMD 74.89308
GNF 9002.775012
GTQ 8.044861
GYD 217.694733
HKD 8.099528
HNL 26.51647
HRK 7.676073
HTG 136.109222
HUF 406.221964
IDR 16961.207406
ILS 3.679467
IMP 0.85668
INR 90.843618
IQD 1362.638397
IRR 43791.661707
ISK 146.800855
JEP 0.85668
JMD 164.314194
JOD 0.7379
JPY 158.648039
KES 134.183701
KGS 90.964273
KHR 4181.531467
KMF 491.95355
KPW 936.1639
KRW 1503.832993
KWD 0.320854
KYD 0.86711
KZT 537.879779
LAK 22603.154688
LBP 93148.296628
LKR 310.654337
LRD 204.967949
LSL 19.321369
LTL 3.071387
LVL 0.629195
LYD 5.112529
MAD 10.410921
MDL 19.478248
MGA 4880.622202
MKD 61.530145
MMK 3378.470504
MNT 3534.538488
MOP 8.346813
MRU 41.737293
MUR 48.577847
MVR 16.02896
MWK 1805.755946
MXN 21.403778
MYR 4.600204
MZN 66.478289
NAD 19.321367
NGN 1557.88289
NIO 38.296018
NOK 11.674524
NPR 145.570427
NZD 1.82812
OMR 0.400463
PAB 1.040567
PEN 3.862573
PGK 4.176294
PHP 60.219258
PKR 290.210744
PLN 4.201504
PYG 8198.606643
QAR 3.787817
RON 4.976443
RSD 117.094316
RUB 101.936364
RWF 1447.880408
SAR 3.900849
SBD 8.815735
SCR 14.964251
SDG 625.138829
SEK 11.346279
SGD 1.402597
SHP 0.85668
SLE 23.818865
SLL 21812.095998
SOS 594.463975
SRD 36.515603
STD 21529.666918
SVC 9.104921
SYP 13524.446121
SZL 19.15494
THB 34.908422
TJS 11.357513
TMT 3.651039
TND 3.305635
TOP 2.43621
TRY 37.355983
TTD 7.047678
TWD 34.169664
TZS 2649.893797
UAH 43.309968
UGX 3829.601758
USD 1.040182
UYU 45.27982
UZS 13512.009961
VES 61.77274
VND 26183.980953
VUV 123.492494
WST 2.91337
XAF 655.359708
XAG 0.032145
XAU 0.000363
XCD 2.811144
XDR 0.798092
XOF 655.375445
XPF 119.331742
YER 258.953635
ZAR 19.280319
ZMK 9362.887837
ZMW 29.160843
ZWL 334.938174
  • BCC

    -0.8200

    124.75

    -0.66%

  • SCS

    0.2500

    11.56

    +2.16%

  • RIO

    0.1700

    61.37

    +0.28%

  • JRI

    0.1900

    12.83

    +1.48%

  • BCE

    0.5000

    24.9

    +2.01%

  • RBGPF

    0.2700

    66.27

    +0.41%

  • CMSD

    0.1400

    23.82

    +0.59%

  • NGG

    0.8100

    62.67

    +1.29%

  • CMSC

    0.1600

    23.5

    +0.68%

  • GSK

    2.8600

    37.7

    +7.59%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    7.5

    +1.33%

  • AZN

    1.9750

    70.935

    +2.78%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    8.27

    +0.85%

  • RELX

    0.9100

    50.77

    +1.79%

  • BTI

    0.8700

    41.1

    +2.12%

  • BP

    0.0300

    31.67

    +0.09%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

K.Okada--JT