The Japan Times - Climate scorecard: good news and bad news

EUR -
AED 3.824588
AFN 79.136766
ALL 98.140077
AMD 415.198572
ANG 1.877
AOA 951.206991
ARS 1090.486799
AUD 1.659721
AWG 1.8769
AZN 1.77027
BAM 1.950501
BBD 2.102797
BDT 127.004944
BGN 1.953324
BHD 0.39241
BIF 3035.319506
BMD 1.041276
BND 1.409278
BOB 7.196276
BRL 6.188404
BSD 1.041475
BTN 90.0418
BWP 14.404795
BYN 3.408257
BYR 20409.00937
BZD 2.092026
CAD 1.498131
CDF 2962.430314
CHF 0.943919
CLF 0.037409
CLP 1032.216479
CNY 7.572367
CNH 7.581864
COP 4431.930925
CRC 523.779474
CUC 1.041276
CUP 27.593814
CVE 110.686698
CZK 25.153579
DJF 185.055798
DKK 7.460576
DOP 63.945061
DZD 140.671177
EGP 52.386801
ERN 15.61914
ETB 131.252866
FJD 2.409304
FKP 0.857581
GBP 0.845332
GEL 2.978331
GGP 0.857581
GHS 15.826542
GIP 0.857581
GMD 76.012826
GNF 9013.2845
GTQ 8.050129
GYD 217.785169
HKD 8.109879
HNL 26.555912
HRK 7.684146
HTG 136.001156
HUF 410.658428
IDR 16916.257323
ILS 3.689343
IMP 0.857581
INR 90.03044
IQD 1364.071545
IRR 43837.718673
ISK 146.1015
JEP 0.857581
JMD 163.41602
JOD 0.738683
JPY 163.003944
KES 134.845315
KGS 91.059658
KHR 4197.383338
KMF 492.107326
KPW 937.148505
KRW 1495.704412
KWD 0.321027
KYD 0.867938
KZT 542.528625
LAK 22699.816611
LBP 93225.179411
LKR 311.006529
LRD 202.997191
LSL 19.253261
LTL 3.074617
LVL 0.629857
LYD 5.117886
MAD 10.409115
MDL 19.423137
MGA 4914.822946
MKD 61.54156
MMK 3382.023792
MNT 3538.25592
MOP 8.354362
MRU 41.526221
MUR 48.367306
MVR 16.046045
MWK 1808.174035
MXN 21.340061
MYR 4.618578
MZN 66.548137
NAD 19.253034
NGN 1621.266858
NIO 38.316373
NOK 11.742495
NPR 144.06728
NZD 1.837827
OMR 0.400823
PAB 1.041475
PEN 3.871987
PGK 4.167447
PHP 60.981808
PKR 290.151533
PLN 4.223677
PYG 8237.619457
QAR 3.791277
RON 4.975738
RSD 117.149829
RUB 103.345661
RWF 1449.456176
SAR 3.905965
SBD 8.824531
SCR 15.005455
SDG 625.806941
SEK 11.454817
SGD 1.411314
SHP 0.857581
SLE 23.636636
SLL 21835.036753
SOS 595.086376
SRD 36.527702
STD 21552.310629
SVC 9.113241
SYP 13538.670384
SZL 19.253458
THB 35.249276
TJS 11.398458
TMT 3.654879
TND 3.327403
TOP 2.438771
TRY 37.117542
TTD 7.074813
TWD 34.06045
TZS 2629.22167
UAH 43.741759
UGX 3832.605711
USD 1.041276
UYU 45.576175
UZS 13541.794113
VES 57.991537
VND 26125.614546
VUV 123.622376
WST 2.916434
XAF 654.182811
XAG 0.033784
XAU 0.000378
XCD 2.814101
XDR 0.802424
XOF 654.430405
XPF 119.331742
YER 259.329891
ZAR 19.275575
ZMK 9372.736948
ZMW 29.030431
ZWL 335.290443
  • RBGPF

    0.1600

    62.36

    +0.26%

  • RYCEF

    0.1500

    7.42

    +2.02%

  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    23.49

    -0.26%

  • RIO

    -0.6100

    61.12

    -1%

  • GSK

    -0.3500

    33.43

    -1.05%

  • NGG

    -1.5400

    60.05

    -2.56%

  • BTI

    -0.1600

    36.57

    -0.44%

  • BP

    -0.3900

    31.13

    -1.25%

  • AZN

    0.2400

    68.2

    +0.35%

  • VOD

    -0.1700

    8.38

    -2.03%

  • RELX

    -0.2900

    49.26

    -0.59%

  • SCS

    -0.2200

    11.58

    -1.9%

  • JRI

    -0.0400

    12.53

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -1.2000

    127.92

    -0.94%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    23.96

    -0.17%

  • BCE

    -0.2400

    23.15

    -1.04%

Climate scorecard: good news and bad news
Climate scorecard: good news and bad news

Climate scorecard: good news and bad news

The task is clear -- stop burning fossil fuels, radically reduce energy demand and slash all planet-warming emissions in order to keep the planet cool enough so humans, animals and plants can survive and thrive.

Text size:

So how do the actions of the world so far match up to the challenge?

Here is a rundown from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's handbook on how to halt global warming:

- Emissions growth is slowing -

While we are continuing to spew more carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere, the rate of that increase has slowed in recent years.

Emissions actually fell in 2020 -- by an estimated 5.8 percent compared to 2019 -- as governments around the world imposed unprecedented lockdowns to try to halt the spread of Covid-19.

Demand for energy shrank in almost all areas -- except residential buildings. International aviation emissions were down some 45 percent.

Meanwhile, at least 24 countries in the world have managed to cut greenhouse gas emissions and consumption-based CO2 pollution for a decade or more. Almost all are in Europe, although the list also includes the United States and Jamaica.

- But they need to fall, and fast -

Emissions have already rebounded from the pandemic.

Developing nations that have come from a low base per capita are seeing sharp increases.

And carbon footprints per person in rich countries remain stubbornly high, particularly in Australia, Canada.

- We have most of the means -

There are a range of low-carbon technologies to produce electricity and these are becoming cheaper, better and more widely used. These include solar photovoltaics (PV), onshore and offshore wind, and batteries.

"In many contexts solar PV and onshore wind power are now competitive with fossil-based generation," the report said.

Since 2010 emissions from coal have grown, but more slowly, as the US and Europe retired some old plants, while China added fewer new ones. A large number of planned coal plants around the world were either scrapped or converted so that they could also burn biomass.

- But we struggle to kick the dirty fuel habit -

All of the world's electricity will have to come from low-carbon generation by 2050 to meet the Paris Agreement global warming targets. This is "challenged" by growing electricity demand.

Currently, solar PV and wind generation technologies account for less than 10 percent of the market.

Despite coal's hefty C02 emissions, some countries and even international development banks continue to fund and develop new coal capacity.

- We can transform transport, buildings and industry -

Electrification is a "feasible, scalable and affordable" option to decarbonise mass transportation.

Electric vehicles (EVs) are the fastest-growing part of the automobile industry and if these cars and trucks are charged with low-carbon electricity they can significantly reduce emissions.

It is possible to make existing and new buildings in all parts of the world either nearly zero-energy or low-energy.

Most industrial processes in general can be decarbonised through a combination of technology using electricity and hydrogen, carbon capture and innovation in the circular use of materials (i.e. recycling and reusing).

- But change is slow -

Transport emissions grew at an average of two percent a year per between 2010 and 2019, due to continued "high travel demand, heavier vehicles, low efficiencies and car-centric development".

Beyond charging EVs with zero-emissions electricity, car manufacturing, shipping and aviation also need to be decarbonised, as do supply chains in general.

As for construction, the low ambition of government policies is a particular concern, for both existing buildings in developed countries and new buildings in developing ones.

The strong global demand for basic materials means industrial emissions continue to grow. This demand must be sharply reduced, alongside the rapid scale up of low-carbon innovations, otherwise there is a risk of locking in emissions "for decades to come".

- A crescendo of climate action -

An increasing number of countries say they plan to achieve "net-zero" C02, or greenhouse gas, emissions by mid-century.

Mandatory policies like pricing and regulation have expanded, while many businesses have promised to curb emissions.

Climate activism is growing, labour unions are starting to engage with the issues, while media coverage of climate change is increasing and becoming better at accurately reflecting the science.

- But action needs to happen faster -

Current national pledges under the Paris Agreement will not limit global warming to the target of 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Many net-zero targets are "ambiguously defined" and the policies to achieve them are not yet in place.

Low-carbon alternatives need much more investment, while "status quo interests" are acting to block progress.

People are also subjected to misinformation on online and in traditional media that has "undermined significantly" understanding of the science.

S.Yamada--JT